The Inuit Way of Life :: essays research papers

The Inuit were people who lived in the Arctic such(prenominal) as Alaska, Northern Canada and Greenland. They can also be called Eskimos. The word Inuit refers to veritable people of the north and from this distinction as well as their way of life of living which I exposed at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, I dissolve that these people were a race of people with a strong timbre for life in general as well as all(prenominal) other. Their social customs included storytelling, dancing, drum playing, crafts, celebrations, games, hunting and survival skills. They found their social structure on the land, their families, and traditions that were passed on through generations.The Inuit hunted and fished whale, seal, and sea horse by way of a kayak or by time lag patiently near holes in the ice. They made great use of living organism skins for warm and beautiful clothing as unitary may observe on display in the Polar World exhibit at the museum. They primarily made a livin g by hunting, trapping, and buying and selling handicrafts. They also traded whale blubber which was used for fuel. They traded the blubber with missionaries, whalers, and other foreigners. constitution in Inuit society was nearly non-existent. There were no class divisions or divisions of rank among the people. They can simply be described as Eskimo tribes who dual-lane the same traditions. There were no prominent leadershiphip roles among these people. Family was considered the main pore with the eldest male of each family reigning with highest authority. This society was non-aggressive with values concern on cooperation. This is probably why there were no prominent leaders in this liberal-like society. The only character held in high regard was the priest-doctor who was believed to have relations with supernatural powers which controlled health, power, and the weather. The Inuits valued their families and each member looked fall out for each other. Kinship typically includ ed three past generations from the agnatic as well as maternal sides. These generations were extremely close. The doings of one member were felt as the accountability of the whole group. Small feuds lots resulted between different families.