Critique on Genetically Modifying Humans Essay

Richard hay has written to the highest degree a topic that roughly of us have rarely listd ab appear, but have probably seen in a movie once before. In the 1950s, after Watson and Crick had observe DNA structures, it was predicted that one day we would be able to genetic every(prenominal)y fire our babyren. Since this prediction, scientists have been discovering specific genes that can alter such areas as reducing of the risk of depression, potenti every last(predicate)y doubling life span, growing taller and so forth. Richard goes on to mention that the possibilities of genetic modifications are great, since there are 30,000 genes in the homophile genome.Mr Hayes sites these claims of genome bioengineering from science magazine words, University scientific studies, and biotech pharmaceutical social club reports. On the same breath, as he talks about all the miracles that can be accomplished by these high tech advancements, he describes the dark side of leveraging these bre akthroughs. Richard worries about this technology only world used to prevent medical conditions and not for a hugely paid cosmetic and enhancement consumer product. at once the first genetically modified child is born, it could lead to a chain of events that could never be undone or controlled.This new wave of bioengineered humanity would no longer be playacting by the rules of natural selection we all know. These new super humans could regard the non-genetically modified humans as inferior and see themselves as the know. This potentially can lead the world into dark ages, where they would be the masters and everyone else, their slaves. Hayes certainly does make some bold claims, but most of which are backed by reputable scientific data. He references University of atomic number 20 studies, where it has been proven that genes are related to life span.When it comes to the potential for genome engineering, each of Hayes logical arguments is supported by a credible source. When it comes to genetically modifying things, we hear about it all the time. Now-a-days, we hear about the miracles of stem cell research, copy your dog and genetically modified foods. What Hayes is speaking of sounds completely plausible. The coterminous step after successfully bioengineering your food, would be to bioengineer your family pet, then your children. I would want a dog that doesnt chew up my slippers, pellet holes in my garden or a child that was immune to unhealthiness and had a perfect memory.Wouldnt you? This technology would have to be make available to every person on the planet. If it were not available to all, it probably would be misused, in a multitude of ways. I do signify this is something we must do. We must keep progressing as a species, even if it authority engineering ourselves. We could engineer our kids to be extremely intelligent, live twice as long and be immune to disease. How else are we going to explore the cosmos to discover a new planet to se ttle on? This article started off as an intriguing read and ended up in a dark twisted world, more like something you would see in a sci-fi movie.It is hard to say how things would exactly play out, if we allowed gene modification. Richard makes all sorts of assumptions about how the world would turn out if it is allowed. He talks about how it would be impossible to allow everyone access to this technology. A few long time ago a team of academics gathered to try and figure out a way to make this possible. They determined that it would not be possible to bring the new eugenic technologies to everyone. How do they know this to be? Once this technology is perfected and ready for mass production, it could be as brazen as an entry level cell phone these days.