'President Kennedy as the person who saved the west from nuclear war Essay\r'

'Section 1\r\nThe rimy contend, which existed among the Soviet Union and the join States follo adoptg World War ll, and the invariable panic of atomic devastation, which it presented, evolved throughout its history. The birth surrounded by these dickens super powers was forced at the best, at its worst; it was strange and came near the unleashing of the devastating nuclear arsenal some(prenominal) countries possessed.\r\nThe term ‘ arctic struggle’ was used prototypal by an the Statesn banker relating to the tension surrounded by the U.S.S.R and the USA, when he verbalize cold he was referring to the fact that both countries were doing there best to stop moderate fighting and for it to become a ‘ gamy’ struggle.\r\nThe reason these two super powers fought were both everyplace their ideologies on how to live in for all(prenominal) unmatchable(a) others land where as America was stretch out by Capitalism, this was the system tha t gave common civilians the chasten to vote for which ever organization society they wanted to run the country it in around(prenominal) case gave the press freedom of speech where g all everyplacenment scandals were hardly illegalize, unlike The Soviets who ran a one take upy state consisting of whole the commie party cal direct Soviets, tout ensemble be suffer intimately of the Soviets were communist the government was materially run by the one party. Also there was press government run industries like the media as this was run by them, the crudes was censored strictly throughout covering up all government scandal. The other major difference was the distribution of wealth and the run amongst the rich and the poor as this was in truth low in Russia only in the U.S average living standards where practically higher as wealth was disperse more than than un correctly throughout commercial enterprise Tycoons and their estates.\r\nAll these factors lead to nucl ear war and the cold war surrounded by Russia and America, America was the first to release a nuclear attack and used, the first nuclear atomic bomb on the Japanese urban center of Hiroshima, on 6th August 1945 demonstrate the world what lengths America would go to, to win a war.\r\nSource 1a\r\nA last-place fourth dimension\r\nThe affinity as well as evolved over time, and the emergence of Fidel Castro in Cuba was a particle accelerator for a change in the dealingship between these powers. The threat he and his communist party presented to his American neighbours would change the commission the Americans dealt with their cold War enemies. In the comparable sort, Castro’s communists withal gave Nikita Khrushchev and the Soviets an entrance into northeastward and Central American affairs.\r\nSection two\r\nPrior to the vicissitude in Cuba, during Batista’s brutal administration there was a period of time describes as ‘an temperance of tensionsâ €™ in bloods between the due east and the westernmost. These tensions were ease because many of the potential conflicts between east and horse opera sides had been resolved, such(prenominal) as the 1956 Hungarian R growth.\r\nDuring Batista’s regime as potentate over Cuba the Americans had been its main customer of Cuba’s main re author, Sugar cane, this do relationships between Cuba an America quite friendly and Cuba was climb of American exercise with Gentlemen’s Clubs, Brothels and casino’s it was nick named the rich Americans playground, also on the island were strong Mafia connections, notwithstanding the police did little to stop them as they could easily be bribed and were often traffic themselves.\r\nThe sculptural relief of tensions and the apparent lack of avocation from every of the two cold war powers in onslaught a put one overst one another(prenominal) would be brought to an end following Castro fetching over Cuba in ear ly 1959, but at this time the relationship between Fidel Castro and the Cuban Communist was not entirely clear. During the Cuban revolution that saw Fulgencio Batista’s brutal regime overthr suffer and come to an end, Castro had been at the fore of the uprising. He sold all the American owned business’s the mere charge of a ‘Communist’ island within 100 miles of the linked States force much attention to Cuba, both to the Soviet Union and their American rivals.\r\nThe real number cold war evolution did not suck its beginnings in the working relationship, which was to be found between Havana and Moscow, but earlier in the deteriorating relationship between the Cuban capital and Washington. American business interests in Cuba were being threatened by Castro’s policy of nationalisation of lands, and the U.S. was begging to notion that they â€Å"could not ‘do business’ with Castro’s government” this feeling was the re ason for the beginnings of an effect against the Castro Regime ap quizd by hot seat Eisenhower, and late adopted by flush toilet Fitzgerald Kennedy when he was elected to office in November 1960. This architectural plan consisted of semipolitical accomplish, propaganda and array calling operations” and was rear end the disreputable Bay of Pigs attack, although this program was directed against Cuba it may also adjudge sent another message to the soviet Communists that the Americans were not prepared to tolerate socialism so near their own leaps. In any case,\r\nSource 2b\r\nConcluding sentence\r\nThis policy, a direct reception to Fidel Castro himself and the communist regime, which he had brought to power, could not admit any positive effect on relations between the Capitalist Americans and the communists.\r\nThe real gain of Cuba to the Soviets was in the form of gaining leverage in negotiations over Berlin, which was of far more vastness to the communist than the small, poor island ruled by Castro. Tensions over Berlin came close to after Khrushchev demanded the westward powers, which occupied Berlin, evacuate the city. Khrushchev, â€Å"alarmed at the growing army and economical bearing of West Germany” otherwise, the soviets would turn the administration of Berlin to the East German government, with which the west had no agreements and at a lower place the rule of which the western powers would prolong no access whatsoever to Berlin. By removing the western solves from the area, Khrushchev hoped to â€Å"Weaken ties between the take root in States and West Germany and provoke disunity among NATO allies” The NATO powers however did not back down, however there came to be a d�tente over the head teacher of administration of Berlin. This still existed in 1962, and Fidel Castro would prove to be a willing inebriate in a crusade by Khrushchev to gain the upper hand in the negotiations over the admi nistration of Berlin.\r\nPrior to the events of 1962, which do up the Cuban rocket crisis came the infamous Bay of Pigs invasion, this great American affliction showed to which lengths the Americans were prepared to go to mutilate the influence of Castro and communism from the island of Cuba. On 16th April 1961, 1,300 â€Å"CIA- proficient Cuban exiles in American-surplus planes and boats left to interest Cuba and liberate their countrymen” this so called liberation was unsuccessful the Cuban people had been prepared for such an invasion and in fact the Cuban Military forces and Castro himself also knew of the plans of the invasion. One century and fifty invaders were killed, the rest taken captive and the American attempt to overthrow Castro and his regime had failed. There were several crucial outcomes to this invasion however, all affecting the relationship between the eastern and western powers.\r\nThe soviets, due to the power of the island nation to withstand th e invasion, became convinced of the harbor of Cuba in gaining the upper hand over the U.S. enough so that the Castro’s regime would now be â€Å"worthy of a major military and diploma. But eon the Soviet Union now considered Cuba a worthy ally, it became evident to Castro that he also needed to pursue a relationship with the Soviet Union for protection because his island was very much within the U.S. sphere of influence. The invasion, turn unsuccessful, showed that the Americans were willing to go to great lengths to remove him from office, and at this burden, the best solution for Castro appeared to be the pursuit of an alliance with Moscow, directed against his American neighbours.\r\nThe strengthening of ties between Cuba and the Soviet Union, as a result of this Bay of Pigs invasion, led directly to the Cuban Missile Crisis. As much as that conflict resulted from Khrushchev’s design to take advantage of Cuba’s proximity to the U.S. to install missile si tes, it was the American policy towards Cuba, that which want, by any nub necessary, to remove Fidel Castro’s influence over Cuba, which pushed the new Communist allies into each other’s arms. The mere presence of Fidel Castro was responsible for the heightening of tensions between the Soviet Union and John F. Kennedy’s fall in States leading up to the crisis.\r\nThere was a strong Soviet presence in Cuba prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The sanctions, which followed Castro’s rise to power placed a large burden on the Cuban economy, as the U.S., naturally, had been the island’s primary trading partner. This burden was eased by the Soviets who, in 1960, agree to buy out Cuba’s U.S. sugar share, and later made the scream to provide ‘necessary aid’ in the case of armed intervention. In fact, United States sanctions against Fidel Castro and his government â€Å"provided the rationale and the catalytic action which accelerate close economic, military and political relations between Cuba and the USSR.” But the graveness of the Soviets economic pursuits in Cuba is far less(prenominal) than the deal made which allowed the Soviets to build missile sites on the island. Due to the deadlock over the Berlin question, Khrushchev matte he needed to gain the upper hand in military might to have his way.\r\nBecause the USSR was falling behind in the arms race, a notional solution was needed which would achieve equating and the â€Å"cheapest and fastest way … was to install shorter-range missiles on Cuba.” The role of Castro in this affair was to repeat the missiles from the USSR, but for his own set of reasons. Castro felt that some protection was needed from the threat of any more American invasions, and the addition of missile sites to his island would strengthen his position considerably. The military installations instilled confidence and would be a awful asset given any aggression by the Americans or their Western allies. In any case, both nations had interests in the missiles being installed in Cuba, so Castro gave the plan his blessing. By this time, it had become clear to the Soviets that their high expectations of Castro were warranted, as this revolutionary leader had given them the hazard they thought they needed to tip the crustal plate in their favour where there real interests lay, Berlin.\r\nFor someone who had so critical a role in bringing active the Cuban Missile Crisis, Fidel Castro played only the smallest role once it began. When an American U-2 first spotted evidence of the construction of a missile site in Cuba on 14 October 1962, the crisis began. date negotiations to end the crisis were underway between Kennedy and Khrushchev, Castro was left out and â€Å"did not take the exclusion lightly” Castro even went so far as to establish a speech, on 23 October 1962, denying that â€Å"either the Cubans or the Soviets would ever consi der withdrawing their missiles” musical composition the Soviets and the Americans were negotiating a peace, slice still on the brink of launch an all-out nuclear attack, Castro was still trying to extract some political gain from the conflict.\r\nHe enforce a set of conditions on the removal of missiles from his island, which called for the end of the U.S. blockade of the island, which had resulted when the crisis began, and for the end of inflammatory acts on the part of the U.S. against Cuba. All of these were do by when a final agreement was hammer out between the U.S. and the USSR. Castro’s inflexible refusal to admit that he had been the real nonstarter in the entire crisis was brought into focus when he refused entrance into Cuba to UN observers who were to assure that the missiles were dismantled, as had been agreed upon by Kennedy and Khrushchev. Castro’s reaction to his face-to-face failure in the affair would auspicate the lesson he learned, a s he made it known that â€Å"never again in the chess juicy of power” would his country play â€Å"the docile pawn”\r\nWhile Castro was involved in conflicts in Africa in the 1960s, and supported the communism of Vietnam, his involvement in the Cuban Missile Crisis left the superior of marks upon relations between the unwarmed War powers. What Castro may not have cognise in all his asperity over the results of the crisis is that, unwittingly, he had the effect of easing tensions between the U.S. and the USSR. His mere presence and his part in bringing about the crisis were instrumental in beginning a new era in the relationship between East and West. Prior to this record, any move by one side was met by an equally strong move by the other.\r\nUnder such a system, no peaceful end could be sought to any conflict, only the escalating of tensions to a falling out point. The breaking point in the cold-blooded War was the most undesirable, nuclear conflict, the imp lications of which were most destructive and grave. Indeed, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, while Castro was dreaming of power and prestige for his infixed Cuba, the Americans were reportedly minutes away for launching their nuclear arsenal against Russia, and likely the Soviets were in a similar position. But the diplomatical outcome to the problem, in spite of Castro’s designs, represented a turning point in the way problems were dealt with between the United States and their nuclear rivals. In a game of such high stakes, no eternal could move be met with countermove because in such a case both would be losers. The value of diplomacy was realized and, in a way, Fidel Castro and his regime were facilitators for this lesson.\r\n later on the crisis, relations once again eased into detente between the U.S. and the USSR and Castro, standing by his assumption that he would no durable be the pawn for any other, no longer wielded much influence in unheated War administrat ion. And the relations between the two powers eased, that existing between Castro’s Cuba and the USSR grew more strained. These were restored somewhat later, but no longer were they of particular military or outside(a) significance. Cuba has continued to be a source of frustration to the United States, but this mainly from an ideological or philosophical point of view. While Cuba â€Å"gradually began to pursue a pro-Moscow course” their alliance with Moscow no longer posed any real threat to America in the way of future military aggression. Through the Cold War, the Americans had developed a great aggressiveness towards anything perceived as being communist, Marxist, or socialist and Cuba has retained this aspect, but to have had any great fear of Castro and what he might do after the resolution of the missile crisis would not have been warranted.\r\nCastro’s role in the relationship between East and West, thence, was played out over a short period of a few years, but on the largest of stages. His initial contribution to the evolution of this relationship was to cause it a large degree of strain. When the revolution of Castro became successful, he infuriated the Americans whose businesses and lands were being revoked by Castro’s policy of nationalization. The U.S. would accept this sermon at the hands of so unnoticeable a neighbour and launched the Bay of Pigs invasion. The reaction of the Cubans to this was the strengthening of ties with the USSR and inevitably the tensions between the USSR and the U.S. were embossed as well. The USSR had one foot in the door, intolerably close to the American border and when the Soviets but this played this strategic panel but installing the missile sites, the tensions were increase further.\r\nCastro’s role in the evolution of East/West relations terminate soon after this point as both the Americans and Russians began to ignore him and pursue their own solutions to the conflict Castro brought about. Because of this exclusion, Castro no longer wielded any influence and faded into the background. Nevertheless, the Americans had been humiliated by seeing an island nation, which they had once dominated fall under the influence of the Russian communists, and this was Castro’s own accomplishment. It brought the prominence and importance to his country, which he desired and did fulfil some of the more immediate goals such as removing the economic stresses placed on his country by the U.S. sanctions. While the new tensions he brought about between the Soviet Union and the U.S. were better following the crisis, Castro undeniably brought the world one step closer to witnessing nuclear war.\r\nIt could therefore be said of Castro that his role and influence in Cold War politics was twofold. Firstly, it was largely his doing that the two powers came closer to collision than they had ever come before, and it was largely in spite of him that this clash never too k place. Instead, what followed was a detente, which, while still filled with doubt and mistrust of one another, never again came so close to a turn point as during the early years of Castro’s regime in Cuba.\r\n'