Ethics

1 . The five models of normative ethical theories discussed include the pursual from (Quinn , 2009 , Post , 2004 . In parenthesis , I have listed the apology or standard for an action (X ) under the hypothesisdivine command hypothesis (God said do Xact utilitarianism (X will increase happinessrule utilitarianism (performing acts like X routinely in these circumstances would be expected to relate the general happinesssocial contract possibility (X will non break down the rights of myself or othersKantianism (X does not treat people as a means to an end , and even if society adjusted to everyone choosing X in this circumstance , X would remain a viable choice2 . The important difference between utilizing social contract supposition and Kantianism for ethical decision-making is that social-contract supposition is concer ned with rights , while Kantianism is concerned with debt official document and making sure the decision remains viable for others to betray in the incoming .

In social contract theory , decision-making involves determining what set of rights everyone can have without interfering with echt rights of greater importance . Thereafter we just have to necessitate whether a proposed action would violate any of the existing rights . The tiff is considering ahead of time what rights everyone can have that will not conflict with one another and anticipating any exceptions In Kantianism , we flexure out the ide a of rights and consider whether our perform! ing the action would shut up that potential drop decision off to others in the future . In contemporary language , we might say that Kantianism is sustainable decision-making ReferencesPOST...If you want to relieve oneself a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper