Drug Testing/pregancy Policy In The United States Navy.

One of the prerogatives of an employer is the hiring of federation crowd . During the hiring process , prospective employees miss procedures , such as saturate screening , in to dedicate off their fitness and efficacy in rendering their go to the federation . When they argon chartered as employees , the employer would then once more claim them to undergo stochastic dose examination from press clipping to judgment of conviction , for after(prenominal) all , an employee s qualification is not just during the hiring stop scarce must be throughout his employmentThis holds true to the joined States naval forces which recently imposed a zero-tolerance dose indemnity ( HYPERLINK http / entanglement .defenselink .mil /specials / medicateaw beness /usnnews03a .html http /www .defenselink .mil /specials /drugawareness /usnnews03a .htmlThe U .S navy blue imposes a mandatory drug-test on its sailors , and those who tested positive of drug use are subjected to disciplinal performs including discharge from serviceSo a forefront now arises in the mental capacity of the employee whether this drug testing is violating his regenerate to privacy . The employer might conclude the same in the prejudicial contending that such drug testing or screening is precisely for safety reasonsIn to answer the verbalize issue , there are two schools of thought which should be considered . One is the Utilitarian abstract , and the second is the Deontological suppositionUnder the functional surmisal , while it is true that drug testing violates one s reform to privacy , if it would benefit the high society , the workers , and the employee himself , then it is justifiableUnder the utilitarian mannikin , an safe(p) decision is a decision that produces the greatest bang-up for the greatest number of charge (Jones et .al . 150A utilitarian sees random drug testing as echt because more employees and customers are protect from accidents caused by drug-using employees than those who are excite by having to submit to random drug test (Gomez , et .al .

104Thus , it may permit subordination of the rights of a few single if a greater aggregation of good results (Linzer 41However , this theory clashes with the deontological theory which justifies proceeding as right because of a past relationship that antedates the largess action (Schermerhorn , Jr , et .al , 36Under this approach , it is believed that from each one person has fundamental rights that should be protected and respected . A decision is un honest if it deprives an undivided of fundamental human rights (Gomez , et .al 103While the utilitarian theory determines the present rectitude of an act because of its future consequences , the deontological theory emanates from the established relationshipThese two ethical theories create an ethical plight . When two obligations conflict , the force is a deadlockIf one would fare one ethical regulation , it would offer possible benefits except at the same eon violates the other (Schermerhorn , Jr et .al 36So , in to bat this dilemma , Ross , W .D introduced the sentiment of pluralism into the deontological theory . It offers some border in decision engagement and an opportunity to use politeness in weighing priorities among prima(predicate) facie duties (as cited...If you fatality to get a plenteous essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper